3 Comments
User's avatar
Eric's avatar

As an OG generalist (I renamed my blog as the Unrepentant Generalist in 2006, and am @generalist on Twitter), I have many thoughts here. I agree that the "generalist" who thinks that being smart with no experience is valuable is wrong. I wrote up my take on defending generalists back in 2008 at https://www.nehrlich.com/blog/2008/05/14/defending-generalists/ where I make the caae that generalists are valuable in identifying the real problem (so you can call in the specialists to solve it) and in communication (helping different functions align - I used to say my superpower was in interdisciplinary communication).

As context, I did eventually find my way into a Chief of Staff role, 15 years into my career, and before it was the "cool" job - I ran business strategy and operations as the Chief of Staff to the Google Search Ads team from 2012-2019. What made me valuable in that role was not just being smart but having the multiple perspectives from having worked as an engineer, as a product manager, in FP&A, etc.

The broader point I see in your articles is that there is no shortcut - people want to get straight into leadership positions without putting in the work and getting the experience to make good decisions. In my case, even though I had good ideas early in my career, I had a lot to learn about how to influence and persuade and align others.

Expand full comment
Que's avatar

The Tom Kalil link seems broken…

Expand full comment
Tara Seshan's avatar

Whoops, it's a strange link. But I've re-linked it and it should work!

Expand full comment